MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405945858 · doi:10.18280/mmep.111202

Deep Learning-Based Channel Estimation and Dynamic IRS Assignment for Optimized Beamforming in IRS-Aided MC-NOMA Systems

2024· article· en· W4405945858 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Amish Ranjan, Bikash Chandra Sahana

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNomaBeamformingChannel (broadcasting)Computer scienceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a novel framework for optimizing beamforming gain in multicarrier non-orthogonal multiple access (MC-NOMA) systems that are assisted by intelligent reflecting surfaces (IRS).The framework includes channel estimation based on deep learning, dynamic IRS assignment, and beamforming optimization.First, a convolutional neural network-long short-term memory (CNN-LSTM) model was implemented to estimate the channel state information (CSI) accurately.After that, a Qlearning agent utilizes this estimated CSI to allocate IRS elements to user clusters in a dynamic manner, with the objective of optimizing the use of IRS units according to the existing channel conditions.Using the allocated IRS elements and the estimated CSI, a deep Q-network (DQN) is developed to find the best beamforming vectors that save the most power and get the optimum signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR).When compared to random IRS assignment and traditional heuristic beamforming optimization methods, the results show that the proposed framework shows significant improvements in SINR, power efficiency, and total system capacity.Simulation results show that the integration of deep learning and reinforcement learning techniques in the IRS-assisted MC-NOMA system can significantly improve the performance, indicating that the proposed framework is a potential solution for wireless communication in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.791
Threshold uncertainty score0.907

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Modelling and Engineering ProblemsSame topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207