MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4405951907 · doi:10.33096/agrotekmas.v5i3.640

DETEKSI DAN IDENTIFIKASI CENDAWAN Tilletia spp PADA BIJI GANDUM (Triticum aestivum L) IMPOR

2024· article· en· W4405951907 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Musdalifa Musdalifa, Ayu Kartini Parawansa, Arifin Tasrif

Bibliographic record

VenueAGrotekMAS Jurnal Indonesia: Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian. · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicWheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wheat is one of the cereal commodities which is a daily food in large quantities for the world's population. The high import of wheat into the territory of the Republic of Indonesia also allows the entry of quarantine plant pest organisms (OPTK) category A1, namely plant pests that do not yet exist in Indonesia. The OPTK in wheat germ are Tilletia tritici (syn Tilletia caries), Tilletia indica Mitra and Tilletia laevis (syn Tilletia foetida). This study aims to detect and identify the presence of the fungal pathogen Tilletia spp on imported wheat seeds. This research was conducted at the Makassar Agricultural Quarantine Center Laboratory. This study used samples of imported wheat seeds from Ukraine, the United States (USA), Canada, Australia, and Maldova using the washing test method. The results showed that wheat from the United States (USA) and Maldova was positive (+) infected with the fungus Tilletia spp, and wheat from Ukraine, Canada and Australia was negative (-) Tilletia spp. Detection and identification showed that wheat seeds from the United States (USA) found Tilletia caries (syn. Tilletia tritici) and Tilletia indica Mitra, wheat seeds from Maldova found Tilletia foetida (syn. Tilletia laevis).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAGrotekMAS Jurnal Indonesia: Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian.→Same topicWheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology→French-language works237,207→