MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405968934 · doi:10.1093/geroni/igae098.4323

SAFETY OF PUBLIC BUSES IN NATURALLY OCCURRING RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES

2024· article· en· W4405968934 on OpenAlexaffabout
Tracy Chippendale, Ruheena Sangrar, Shlomit Rotenberg, Angela Curl, Lisa A. Suzuki

Bibliographic record

VenueInnovation in Aging · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOlder Adults Driving Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Community mobility is critical to support aging-in-place. For older adults living in low-and moderate-income urban communities, driving may not be an option due to costs associated with car ownership, impracticalities of cars in urban settings, or a lack of driving history. Some older adults must retire from driving due to changes in their functional status. Safe public transportation is therefore paramount to equity in community mobility. The purpose of this Ecological theory informed study was to explore supports and limitations regarding safe public bus use in naturally occurring retirement communities (NORC). A multiple qualitative case study design was used with purposive sampling of representative cases, including four bus routes in NORC neighborhoods, two in Toronto, Canada, and two in NYC. Field observations and in-depth semi-structed interviews were conducted. Inclusion criteria for participants were: 1) Age 60 and older 2) Resident of one of the four NORC neighborhoods 3) Ride the bus on average 2 or more times per month 4) Ambulatory with or without a walking aid (e.g. cane, rollator) and 5) English speaking. A descriptive, thematic approach was used for data coding and analyses, and data was organized according to the Framework Method. Approximately 45 hours of field observations were conducted, and N=17 NORC residents participated in interviews. Results revealed four major themes: Impact of other people’s behavior, Problematic passageways: obstructions, Personal impact on safety, and Space & time orientation. Several subthemes also emerged. Results suggest implications for policy and education to increase safety for older adult bus users.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.135
GPT teacher head0.438
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInnovation in AgingSame topicOlder Adults Driving StudiesFrench-language works237,207