Empathi: Embedding-based Phage Protein Annotation Tool by Hierarchical Assignment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Bacteriophages, viruses infecting bacteria, are estimated to outnumber their cellular hosts by 10-fold, acting as key players in all microbial ecosystems. Under evolutionary pressure by their host, they evolve rapidly and encode a large diversity of protein sequences. Consequently, the majority of functions carried by phage proteins remain elusive. Current tools to comprehensively identify phage protein functions from their sequence either lack sensitivity (those relying on homology for instance) or specificity (assigning a single coarse grain function to a protein). Here, we introduce Empathi, a protein-embedding-based classifier that assigns functions in a hierarchical manner – from general functional categories such as “structural” and “DNA-associated” proteins to more specific ones including “nucleases”, “tail appendages” and “endolysins” to name only a few. These categories were specifically tailored for phage protein functions and organized such that molecular-level functions are respected in each category, making it well suited for training machine learning classifiers based on protein embeddings. We show on a dataset of cultured phage genomes that Empathi significantly outperforms homology-based methods, tripling the number of annotated homologous groups. On the EnVhog database, the most recent and extensive database of metagenomically-sourced phage proteins, Empathi doubled the annotated fraction of protein families from 16% to 33%. On complete genomes taken from new viromes, almost twice as many proteins are annotated using our method, predictions are consistent when compared to existing tools and Empathi predictions are highly colocalized. In addition, by leveraging Empathi’s ability to assign multiple labels to the same protein, it is possible to identify multifunctional proteins such as virion-associated lysins. Having a more global view of the repertoire of functions a phage possesses will assuredly help to understand them and their interactions with bacteria better.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".