MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

PENERAPAN KONSEP LIVABLE STREET DALAM PENATAAN KORIDOR JALAN MULAWARMAN KOTA BALIKPAPAN

2024· article· id· W4405972769 on OpenAlex
Rian Samian, Nadia Almira Jordan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Perencanaan Kota dan Daerah/Jurnal Tata Kota dan Daerah · 2024
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchitectural and Urban Studies
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Konsep livable street adalah pendekatan urban design yang bertujuan menciptakan jalan yang mengutamakan kebutuhan manusia daripada kendaraan, dengan merancang jalan yang aman, nyaman, dan menyenangkan bagi semua orang tanpa memandang usia, kemampuan, atau moda transportasi. Berdasarkan Rencana Detail Tata Ruang (RDTR) dan Peraturan Zonasi (PZ) Kota Balikpapan 2021-2041, Jalan Mulawarman diusulkan menjadi jalan nasional dengan fungsi arteri primer. Di Koridor Jalan Mulawarman, kawasan industri terletak di antara kawasan perdagangan, jasa, dan permukiman, mencampur kegiatan industri dan aktivitas lainnya. Dengan berbagai aktivitas ini, diperlukan konsep jalan yang memaksimalkan fungsi, khususnya jalur pedestrian. Metode analisis yang digunakan adalah walkthrough analysis dan triangulasi. Perumusan konsep penataan koridor Jalan Mulawarman dengan pendekatan livable street dilakukan dengan menggabungkan hasil dari sasaran pertama dengan hasil wawancara dan konsep teori indikator keberhasilan teori livable street, sehingga dapat diperoleh rumusan konsep penataan koridor Jalan Mulawarman dengan pendekatan livable street. Hasil yang diperoleh mencakup kriteria khusus untuk konsep livable street di koridor Jalan Mulawarman, yakni peningkatan kualitas jalur pedestrian di segmentasi 1 dan 2, serta penyediaan jalur pedestrian di segmentasi 3. Selain itu, fasilitas pemberhentian transportasi publik berupa halte disediakan di segmentasi 3. Peningkatan material perkerasan jalur pedestrian dilakukan di segmentasi 1 dan 2, sementara penyediaan material ini dilakukan di segmentasi 3. Ketiga segmen penelitian melibatkan pengaturan ketinggian tepian jalan dan ramp. Penyediaan penerangan, tempat duduk, vegetasi, peneduh, rambu, marka penyeberangan, serta pembatas fisik diterapkan pada semua segmen, termasuk marka parkir di segmen 1 dan 2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.262
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.003
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0010.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it