MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405976439 · doi:10.1093/geroni/igae098.0520

COGNITION AND PAIN ARE ASSOCIATED WITH DISCREPANCIES IN ACTIGRAPHY AND SELF-REPORTED SLEEP MEASURES IN OLDER ADULTS

2024· article· en· W4405976439 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Russell Calderon, Sofia Liu, Miranda McPhillips, Michelle Liu, Yan Liu, Junxin Li

Bibliographic record

VenueInnovation in Aging · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSleep and related disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsActigraphySleep (system call)PsychologyCognitionPhysical medicine and rehabilitationPhysical therapyClinical psychologyMedicineGerontologyInsomniaPsychiatryComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Sleep is a key determinant of health in older adults and is assessed using accelerometer-based (Actigraphy) and self-reported methods. This study aims to describe and identify factors associated with potential discrepancies between Actigraphy and self-reported sleep parameters (“Actigraphy/self-reported discrepancies”) in 125 community-dwelling older adults without dementia [Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) ≥17] using data from a randomized clinical trial (NCT03959202). Participants were 70.4±6.3 years old, 79.2% females, 21.6% with mild cognitive impairment. Actigraphy and corresponding self-reported sleep measures, including time in bed (TIB), sleep onset latency (SOL), total sleep time (TST), and sleep efficiency (SE) were collected using Actiwatch 2 for 7-10 days, sleep diaries, and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Relative to Actigraphy measures, 11.2%, 38.4%, 52.0%, 35.2%, and 36.0%, of participants reported longer TIB(diary) (>15 minutes), TIB(PSQI) (>15 minutes), SOL(PSQI) (>5 minutes), TST(PSQI) (>15 minutes), and better SE(PSQI) (>5%) respectively, whereas 38.4%, 52.0%, 12.0%, 54.4%, and 28.0% of participants reported shorter TIB(diary), TIB(PSQI), SOL(PSQI), TST(PSQI), and worse SE(PSQI) by the same magnitudes. Multiple linear regression analyses adjusted for demographics suggest higher MoCA was associated with reduced Actigraphy/self-reported discrepancies (TIB(Actigraphy-diary):β=-13.6, p=0.037; TIB(Actigraphy-PSQI):β=-11.2, p< 0.01; SOL(Actigraphy-PSQI):β=-3.3, p=0.019; TST(Actigraphy-PSQI):β=-7.4, p=0.01; SE(Actigraphy-PSQI):β=-1.5, p=0.013). Higher pain behavior expression (TIB(Actigraphy-PSQI):β=7.3, p=0.011; SOL(Actigraphy-PSQI):β=2.7, p=0.014) and pain interference (TIB(Actigraphy-diary):β=8.8, p< 0.01) were associated with greater Actigraphy/self-reported discrepancies. In summary, cognitive function and pain were associated with Actigraphy/self-reported discrepancies among older adults without dementia. Given that cognition and pain may interfere with self-perceptions of sleep quality, sleep must be carefully assessed and interpreted in this population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInnovation in AgingSame topicSleep and related disordersFrench-language works237,207