MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4405981119 · doi:10.1093/geroni/igae098.3291

PAN-CANADIAN ESTIMATES OF THE PREVALENCE ASSOCIATED WITH CRITICAL WANDERING AMONG HOME CARE CLIENTS

2024· article· en· W4405981119 on OpenAlexaffabout
Antonio Miguel Cruz, Hector Perez, Micaela Jantzi, Lili Liu, John P. Hirdes

Bibliographic record

VenueInnovation in Aging · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Wandering is a behaviour common in people living with dementia. Persons living with dementia are at increased risk of getting lost and going missing due to critical wandering. However, the evidence is inconclusive. We used 17 years of cross-sectional clinical assessment records from home care services based on interRAI Home Care assessments to provide Pan-Canadian estimates of the prevalence and clinical risks associated with recent critical wandering. (n=1,598,191). The main clinical variable of interest was recent occurrence of critical wandering. We tested associations between wandering and dementia and cognitive impairment. In all the study regions combined, the overall rate of recent wandering is 3.0%, representing 48,641 unique individuals. The sample was comprised of mainly older adults, with 84.3% over the age of 65. The sample was also predominately female (60.9%). A dementia diagnosis including Alzheimer’s disease or other dementias was present in 23.6% of the sample. Dementia was strongly associated with the prevalence of recent wandering Chi-squared(1, N=1,598,191) = 101,298.866, p < 0.0001). Cognitive impairment was also strongly associated with the prevalence of recent wandering Chi-squared(1, N=1,598,191) = 155,414.738, p < 0.0001). Our analyses also show that persons with wandering behaviour experience many different additional clinical problems that can pose important risks to their health and would require attention of first responders and health professionals. interRAI HC offers insights into wandering risk and health profiles of home care client. This information should be used to manage risk in the community and should be shared with first responders where appropriate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.113

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.007
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInnovation in Aging→Same topicGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes→French-language works237,207→