A Qualitative Exploration of the Financial Insecurity Experience Among Older People: Implications for Social Work Practice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The availability of support services to ensure financial security is crucial for older people, particularly those who experience functional disability and or financial incapacity. In Ghana, evidence show that many older people report being financially insecure, necessitating an examination of how social provisions such as the social work profession can innovatively and culturally promote financial security for older people. However, limited evidence exists on how social work can innovatively offer culturally appropriate contributions to address the financial security needs of older people in Ghana. Deploying a descriptive qualitative design, this study presents the qualitative findings of older people’s financial experiences across three Ghanaian regions. The study participants (N = 15) were purposefully sampled from Ashanti, Bono-East, and Central regions in Ghana to engage in semi-structured interviews. Analysis of participants’ experiences regarding their finances using NVIVO 20 resulted in six major themes namely: 1) source of finance; 2) reliability of financial sources; 3) adequacy of finances; 4) perspectives on financial soundness; 5) perceived status of financial security; and 6) preferred measures to improve financial status. These themes, put together, enhance our understanding of the seriousness of older people’s financial situation and a quest for financial security. The findings offer evidence for the social work profession in Ghana to adopt innovative and culturally sound approaches, including the ‘nnoboa’ strategy (a common concept in rural Akan communities in Ghana for cooperative cultivation and fundraising) in ensuring financial security for older people.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".