MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406011975 · doi:10.1109/jflex.2025.3525598

Flexible Low-Power Digital Circuits With Unipolar Amorphous Silicon Thin-Film Transistors

2024· article· en· W4406011975 on OpenAlexaff
Shubham Ranjan, Sparsh Kapar, Czang-Ho Lee, William S. Wong, Manoj Sachdev

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal on Flexible Electronics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThin-Film Transistor Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThin-film transistorAmorphous siliconMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsTransistorSiliconElectronic circuitDigital electronicsElectrical engineeringPower (physics)Oxide thin-film transistorAmorphous solidEngineering physicsEngineeringNanotechnologyCrystalline siliconPhysicsVoltageChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thin-film transistor (TFT) technology has demonstrated its effectiveness in large-area cost-efficient applications such as displays, flexible electronics, and medical devices. However, TFTs are typically unipolar in nature, and therefore, the realization of CMOS-like digital circuits is challenging. Traditional methods for implementing logic gates and complex circuits with unipolar TFT devices lead to high static power consumption and limited output swing. While various mitigation techniques have been developed, they fail to eliminate the direct path current problem in these circuits, which hinders static power reduction. The objective of this study is to address these issues and study its effect on flexible substrate.In this article, we propose logic gates that address these issues using a half-latch circuit. To demonstrate the concept, a 3-to-8 decoder was built using only n-type amorphous silicon (a-Si:H) TFTs on both glass and flexible substrates. We analyzed the impact of bending and substrate materials on the design. It was observed that the TFTs show an increase in current up to 8% under tensile stress, while a decrease in current up to 4% under compressive stress on flexible substrate. Measurements indicate that the proposed design reduces the average total power consumption of the 3-to-8 decoder by 46.5% compared to state-of-the-art techniques under various conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.755
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal on Flexible ElectronicsSame topicThin-Film Transistor TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207