An automated privacy-preserving self-supervised classification of COVID-19 from lung CT scan images minimizing the requirements of large data annotation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study presents a novel privacy-preserving self-supervised (SSL) framework for COVID-19 classification from lung CT scans, utilizing federated learning (FL) enhanced with Paillier homomorphic encryption (PHE) to prevent third-party attacks during training. The FL-SSL based framework employs two publicly available lung CT scan datasets which are considered as labeled and an unlabeled dataset. The unlabeled dataset is split into three subsets which are assumed to be collected from three hospitals. Training is done using the Bootstrap Your Own Latent (BYOL) contrastive learning SSL framework with a VGG19 encoder followed by attention CNN blocks (VGG19 + attention CNN). The input datasets are processed by selecting the largest lung portion of each lung CT scan using an automated selection approach and a 64 × 64 input size is utilized to reduce computational complexity. Healthcare privacy issues are addressed by collaborative training across decentralized datasets and secure aggregation with PHE, underscoring the effectiveness of this approach. Three subsets of the dataset are used to train the local BYOL model, which together optimizes the central encoder. The labeled dataset is employed to train the central encoder (updated VGG19 + attention CNN), resulting in an accuracy of 97.19%, a precision of 97.43%, and a recall of 98.18%. The reliability of the framework's performance is demonstrated through statistical analysis and five-fold cross-validation. The efficacy of the proposed framework is further showcased by showing its performance on three distinct modality datasets: skin cancer, breast cancer, and chest X-rays. In conclusion, this study offers a promising solution for accurate diagnosis of chest X-rays, preserving privacy and overcoming the challenges of dataset scarcity and computational complexity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".