MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406020553 · doi:10.1002/ece3.70771

Whole Genome Sequencing Reveals Genetic Differences Between Symbiodiniaceae Populations Among Reproductively and Geographically Isolated <i>Acropora</i> Colonies in Western Australia

2025· article· en· W4406020553 on OpenAlexafffund
Solveig Eriksson, Mikhail V. Matz, Peter D. Vize, Natalie L. Rosser

Bibliographic record

VenueEcology and Evolution · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCoral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of WollongongCanadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitsubishi Electric Research LaboratoriesMinderoo FoundationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsBiologyGenetic diversityGenetic variationPopulationEvolutionary biologyAcroporaSympatric speciationAllopatric speciationGenetic structureCoralEcologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Significant genetic differentiation between Symbiodiniaceae populations in coral hosts can be induced by a range of factors including geography, latitude, depth, temperature and light utilisation. The conventional method of measuring Symbiodiniaceae diversity involving the ITS2 region of rDNA has several limitations, stemming from insufficient genetic resolution and the multi‐copy nature of the marker. This could be improved by using higher throughput whole genome sequencing to identify fine‐scale population genetic differences and provide new insight into factors influencing coral‐Symbiodiniaceae associations. The aim of this study was to investigate the genetic diversity of Symbiodiniaceae populations using low‐coverage whole genome sequencing in sympatric populations of Acropora cf. secale and allopatric populations of Acropora millepora that reproduce in different seasons in Western Australia. Genetic diversity of Symbiodiniaceae populations in these two species was examined using principal coordinates analysis and permutational analysis of variance. This analysis revealed that while all colonies were dominated by Cladocopium, there was a significant genetic difference between Symbiodiniaceae populations in both species. In A. millepora, this variation could be due to the latitudinal variation between populations or differences in reproductive seasonality, but in sympatric populations of A. cf. secale, genetic differences between Symbiodiniaceae populations were clearly aligned with the reproductive seasonality of the coral host. The use of whole genome sequencing improved the sensitivity to detect Symbiodiniaceae genetic population structure between coral populations, which increases our ability to identify genetic and potentially functional differences associated with variation in Symbiodiniaceae populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEcology and EvolutionSame topicCoral and Marine Ecosystems StudiesFrench-language works237,207