MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406022906 · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-83914-2

Association of cardiometabolic index with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among middle-aged and elderly populations

2025· article· en· W4406022906 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Mengya Zhu, Hui Jin, Yujie Yin, Ya Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNutritional Studies and Diet
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCase Western Reserve UniversityUniversity of WashingtonYork UniversityJohns Hopkins UniversityNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteUniversity of California, DavisUniversity of Minnesota
KeywordsMedicineProportional hazards modelDiabetes mellitusInternal medicineWaistPopulationCohortBody mass indexSurvival analysisCohort studyDemographyEndocrinologyEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Cardiometabolic Index (CMI) is a well-recognized risk factor for a range of cardiovascular diseases and diabetes mellitus. However, the population-level characteristics of CMI and its potential association with mortality risk among individuals over 40 years of age have not been investigated. This study aims to assess the association between CMI and both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among the middle-aged and elderly population. This cohort study utilized data from 3752 American adults extracted from the Sleep Heart Health Study (SHHS) conducted from 1995 to 2011. The CMI was calculated using the waist-to-height ratio, triglycerides (TG), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality, with mortality data sourced from the SHHS Linked Mortality File. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox regression models were employed to assess the prognostic value of the CMI. Among the 3752 American adults, the mean (SD) age was 65.9 (10.1) years, and 1969 (52.5%) were women. The mean (SD) CMI was 0.914 ± 0.939. Over an average follow-up period of 10.7 years, there were 926 all-cause deaths and 289 cardiovascular deaths. Participants were categorized into three groups based on their CMI levels: tertile (T) 1: 0.315 ± 0.0994; T2: 0.680 ± 0.128; T3: 1.75 ± 1.23. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that elevated CMI was significantly associated with all-cause mortality (HR 1.215, 95% CI 1.032-1.43 for T2; HR 1.309, 95% CI 1.115-1.537 for T3) and cardiovascular mortality (HR 1.305, 95% CI 0.971-1.755 for T2; HR 1.457, 95% CI 1.091-1.947 for T3). After adjusting for confounders, elevated CMI remained significantly associated with all-cause mortality (HR 1.315, 95% CI 1.098-1.575 for T3) and cardiovascular mortality (HR 1.562, 95% CI 1.124-2.17 for T3). Kaplan-Meier survival curves indicated significantly worse outcomes for participants in the higher CMI tertiles for both all-cause mortality (log-rank p = 0.0035) and cardiovascular mortality (log-rank p = 0.035). This national cohort study found that CMI is significantly associated with both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among American adults aged over 40. These findings suggest that CMI could be a valuable tool for identifying high-risk individuals, thereby aiding in the implementation of targeted preventive strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific ReportsSame topicNutritional Studies and DietFrench-language works237,207