MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4406024277 · doi:10.1002/alz.087436

Trajectory of patients over five years in Multispecialty Interprofessional Team Memory Clinics

2024· article· en· W4406024277 on OpenAlexaffabout
Aaron P. Jones, Linda Lee, Tejal Patel

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicInterprofessional Education and Collaboration
Canadian institutionsResearch Institute for AgingUniversity of WaterlooMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMemory clinicDementiaMedicineMedical diagnosisCohortMontreal Cognitive AssessmentRetrospective cohort studyDiseasePediatricsEmergency medicineGerontologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Multispecialty Interprofessional Team (MINT) Memory Clinics manage dementia care in primary care, allowing for more efficient use of limited specialist resources. This study examined the characteristics of patients on their initial assessment in the MINT clinic and investigated the five-year trajectory of patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). METHOD: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 751 patients assessed within a MINT Memory Clinic between June 2006 and May 2019 to collect data on age, gender, diagnosis, and MoCA scores. We plotted the five-year trajectory of MoCA scores for patients with an initial diagnosis of MCI and calculated product-limit estimates of the five-year conversion rate to dementia. We also performed a Cox regression to investigate associations with receiving a dementia diagnosis. RESULT: The median age of our cohort was 75 years; 54% were female. The majority of patients (70%) had a MoCA score of 25 or less; 35% had a score of 20 or less. Diagnoses at the initial assessment included MCI (37%), dementia (20%), subjective cognitive decline (SCD; 12%), and other miscellaneous diagnoses (3%); 27% did not a receive a definitive diagnosis, pending further investigations. Of the 214 patients with an initial diagnosis of MCI and at least one follow-up visit, 28% (N = 60) received a dementia diagnosis at a later date, with 58% being diagnosed with mixed dementia, 22% with Alzheimer's Disease, and 20% with other dementias. The product-limit estimates of the five-year conversion rate was 48.8% (39.5%, 59.2%). Lower MoCA scores at the initial visit were associated with a higher risk of a dementia diagnosis; each one-point increase in MoCA was associated with a 10% decrease in the risk of a dementia diagnosis (aHR: 0.90, 95%CI: 0.85-0.96). Similarly, age was significantly associated with a higher risk of a dementia diagnosis within five years; each five-year increase in age was associated with a 37% increase in risk (aHR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.12-1.67). CONCLUSION: As nearly half of the patients presenting to MINT Memory Clinics have MCI or SCD on initial assessment, MINT clinics provide a significant opportunity for detection and potential intervention at early disease stages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.410
Teacher spread0.382 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicInterprofessional Education and Collaboration→French-language works237,207→