MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406024339 · doi:10.1002/alz.086734

Alterations in brain structure and functional connectivity associated with hearing loss and olfactory loss

2024· article· en· W4406024339 on OpenAlexaff
Natalie A. Phillips, Paul Best, Nicole Grant

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicOlfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyposmiaDementiaAudiologyOlfactionCognitive declineCognitionPsychologyHearing lossAnosmiaOlfactory systemMedicineDiseaseNeuroscienceInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Sensory loss in hearing, vision, and olfaction are highly prevalent in older adults and are each associated with a higher risk of developing dementia. This study sought to identify the extent to which these sensory factors are associated with alterations in brain function and structure older adults with or at risk for dementia. We examined groups who range from relatively low risk (those with normal cognition and no cognitive complaints (NC)), to those with higher risk, namely individuals with subjective reports of cognitive decline (SCD) but normal cognition and those with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). METHOD: We used data from the Comprehensive Assessment of Neurodegeneration and Dementia (COMPASS-ND) study (Release 7). Hearing loss was assessed with a pure-tone screening protocol, vision was assessed with the MARS test for contrast sensitivity, and olfaction was assessed with the Brief Smell Identification Test (BSIT). We examined the frequency of sensory deficits in 128 NC (mean age = 69 years; mean education = 16 years), 135 participants with SCD (age = 70; education = 17), 241 with MCI (age = 72; education = 16), and 93 with Alzheimer's disease (AD, age = 75; education = 15). Participants were matched on age and education, except for AD participants who were older. RESULTS: As shown in Figure 1, normal sensory performance in all three modalities was observed in the minority of participants and decreased in prevalence across the dementia risk spectrum groups (e.g., NC: 29%; SCD: 29%; MCI: 11%; AD: 2%). Olfactory deficits (hyposmia or anosmia) were the most frequent (ranging from 45% in NC to 61% in AD), followed by hearing impairment, and then deficits in visual contrast sensitivity. Deficits in multiple sensory domains were highly prevalent, with 37% of participants with AD having deficits in two or more domains. Preliminary analyses indicate that hearing loss is associated with altered connectivity in the default mode network in MCI participants and olfactory loss is associated with reduced hippocampal volumes in SCD. CONCLUSION: These analyses indicate that sensory loss is highly frequent and co-morbid in persons with or at risk for dementia. These findings have implications for cognition, brain function, functional activities, and care delivery for persons with or at risk for dementia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicOlfactory and Sensory Function StudiesFrench-language works237,207