MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406028913 · doi:10.1002/9781394155293.ch4

Inertial Sensors and Inertial Navigation Systems

2025· other· en· W4406028913 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInertial Sensor and Navigation
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInertial measurement unitInertial navigation systemInertial reference unitInertial frame of referenceUnits of measurementComputer scienceWind triangleGyroscopeRotation (mathematics)Aerospace engineeringEngineeringArtificial intelligencePhysicsRobot

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Focusing on inertial sensors and navigation, this chapter introduces inertial measurements and their role in navigation systems. It addresses the effects of Earth's gravity, rotation, and curvature on inertial measurements and explains the components of an inertial measurement unit (IMU). A detailed discussion on inertial sensor errors, their modeling using Allan Variance (AV), and their compensation methods precede an exploration of inertial navigation systems (INS). MATLAB project samples and practical problems and references are provided to support the theoretical content.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.128
Threshold uncertainty score0.934

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInertial Sensor and NavigationFrench-language works237,207