Visual memory is primarily impacted by tau load in the right hemisphere
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Classical literature has pointed at lateralization of the relationship between memory scores and cerebral hemisphere injury. Epilepsy studies have suggested an association between left hippocampal damage and verbal memory deficits, and between right hippocampal damage and visual memory deficits. We aimed to explore this concept in the context of tauopathy due to Alzheimer's disease. METHOD: we assessed 132 cognitively unimpaired (CU) older adults, and 44 cognitively impaired (CI), amyloid-β positive individuals from the Translational Biomarkers in Aging and Dementia (TRIAD) cohort. All participants had amyloid-PET with [18F]AZD4694 and tau-PET with [18F]MK6240, verbal memory assessments with Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT), and visual memory assessments with Aggie Figures Learning Test (AFLT). We conducted voxel-wise analyses to explore the relationship between tau PET and memory modality. In addition, we run regression models with right or left tau temporal metaROI as predictor and memory scores as outcome variables. We entered global amyloid (PET), sex, age, years of education, ApoE status, grey matter volume and handedness as covariates. Finally, we used the laterality index (LI) to investigate correlations with memory modality. Right laterality is indicated by an LI below 0, while left laterality would be signaled by an LI above 0. RESULT: voxel-wise analyses suggested a lateralized relationship between tau and visual memory scores on the right hemisphere, whereas tau and verbal memory scores were bilaterally associated. Regression analyses showed a trend towards a stronger relationship between temporal tau on the right and visual memory scores. The LI was significantly associated with visual memory performance. Further analyses showed that this relationship seems to be driven by tau positive individuals. CONCLUSION: visual memory performance might be more prominently affected by tau load on the right hemisphere in Alzheimer's disease. Furthermore, a hemispheric imbalance in the amount of tau is related to visual, but not verbal, memory scores.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".