MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4406030201 · doi:10.1002/alz.087911

To study the correlation between cognitive decline and Parkinson’s disease with sarcopenia in Qinghai‐Tibet Plateau

2024· article· en· W4406030201 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Aiqin Zhu, Jiangang Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicBalance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSarcopeniaMontreal Cognitive AssessmentMedicineGrip strengthRating scaleParkinson's diseaseInternal medicineMini–Mental State ExaminationBody mass indexPhysical therapyCognitive impairmentPsychologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: To investigate the correlation between cognitive decline and gait speed and grip strength in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and sarcopenia in the hypoxic environment. METHOD: From October 2022 to December 2023, a cross-sectional study was conducted to collect 134 patients (65 males and 69 females) of Parkinson's disease (age 68.59±10.20 years), who had lived in a Qinghai-Tibet Plateau area (Qinghai province, an average altitude of 2,500m) for more than 30 years. Skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) was measured using InBody S10 Biospace device from Korea. Grip strength(GS) and six-meter gait speed test(GST) were measured by JAMAR handgrip dynamometer and Tsinghua Tongfang 6-meter walking test instrument. PD related scales were used to assess motor and cognitive function. RESULT: The prevalence of PD with sarcopenia was 32.8%, including 59.1% (female) and 40.9% (male). Compared with the PD without sarcopenia group, the PD with sarcopenia group showed an increased in age(65.17±8.80 vs 75.50±9.36 years), MDS Unified-Parkinson Disease Rating Scale-III (MDS-UPDRS III) and Hoehn-Yahr stage (H-Y) grading (which were used to assess the severity of PD), while Body Mass Index (BMI), GST, SMI, GS, Mini-mental state Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) scores were significantly decreased (P < 0.001). Correlation analysis showed that the GS and GST of PD patients were negatively correlated with UPDRS III (r = -0.461; r = -0.410), H-Y grading (r = -0.347, r = -0.399), and Activities of Daily Living (ADL) (r = -0.558, r = -0.344) (P<0.001), and positively correlated with MMSE (r = 0.452, r = 0.506), MOCA (r = 0.267, r = 0.453) (P <0.001), and language ability (r = 0.177, r = 0.208; P <0.05). GS was positively correlated with orientation (r = 0.302), attention and calculation (r = 0.262)(P<0.002). Binary regression analysis showed that BMI (OR = 0.682,95%CI: 0.495-0.940, P<0.05) and MMSE (OR = 0.695,95%CI: 0.557-0.866, P < 0.001) were protective factors for PD with sarcopenia. H-Y stage (OR = 4.942,95%CI: 1.567-15.896, P < 0.006) was a risk factor for PD with sarcopenia. CONCLUSION: Cognitive decline is the main risk factor for Parkinson's disease with sarcopenia in the Qinghai Tibet Plateau region. It may be related to slow gait speed and decreased grip strength. The processing speed and executive dysfunction are mainly related to weak grip strength.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicBalance, Gait, and Falls Prevention→French-language works237,207→