An Innovative Artificial Intelligence Based Decision Making System for Public Health Crisis Virtual Reality Rehabilitation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The COVID-19 disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus was declared by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a spreadable viral disease. During the COVID pandemic, there was difficulty in notifying the Decision-Making System (DMS) about the rapid and precise triage of patients admitted to the emergency wards. As a method to achieve the aim and develop digital healthcare revolutions in data and analytics, digital healthcare information was established. Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a robust automation tool for sustainability in the context of the COVID-19 health crisis on big datasets. Besides, the gap between AI investment and commercial real-time application, which are the initial digital technology development curves, has been identified. It was discovered that AI’s new applications are grounded in Digital Transformation Mapping (DTM) for the DMS of Health Crises. The fast inventions in AI and Machine Learning (ML) have implications for amazingly preventive and clinical healthcare, and for the association, ML was developed as a predictable attention. Billions of smartphones, massive online datasets, linked wireless wearable devices, comparatively cost-effective computing resources and improved ML and Nural Language Processing (NLP) are leveraged by these rapid responses, with the trained dataset of 65% and evaluated in the other 35%, the renowned ML models for structured data like Support Vector Machine (SVM), Multinomial Naive Bayes (MNB), Logistic Regressive Tree (LRT), Decision Tree (DT), Stochastic Gradient Booster (SGB), and Random Forest (RF) are used for simulating new unidentified data. AI-DTM challenges DMS of Health Crises (COVID-19) and the drawbacks of critically contributing risk factors to healthcare diseases. Meanwhile, a comprehensive collection of healthcare datasets over what is spreadable would be required to save human lives, train AI, and limit cost-effective health risks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".