MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406045692 · doi:10.3389/fnins.2024.1505585

Postoperative evaluation of visual and cognitive functions following cataract surgery in patients with age-related cataracts: a prospective longitudinal study

2025· article· en· W4406045692 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xuan Li, Bolin Deng, Bingyue Shui, Lin Zhou, Zhengzheng Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Neuroscience · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOphthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCataractsMedicineCataract surgeryCognitionProspective cohort studyLongitudinal studyOphthalmologySurgeryPsychiatryPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Cataracts are associated with a decline in both cognitive and visual functions. This study examines postoperative changes in cognitive and visual functions in patients with age-related cataracts, focusing on the differential effects of unilateral and bilateral cataract surgeries on these functions. Additionally, the study evaluates changes in cognitive function following cataract surgery in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Methods A cohort of patients (n = 35, 59 eyes) aged 60 years and older (69.9 ± 7.0 years) with age-related cataracts who underwent unilateral or bilateral cataract surgery between May and June 2024 was selected. Cognitive and visual functions were evaluated preoperatively and at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively. Cognitive function was evaluated using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Visual function was assessed using a binocular visual function testing system based on virtual reality (VR) technology, which evaluated low spatial frequency suppression, simultaneous vision, stereopsis, and perceptual eye position under 3D viewing conditions without glasses. Based on preoperative MoCA scores, patients were classified into cognitively normal and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) groups. Results Patients with age-related cataracts demonstrated significant improvements in both cognitive and visual functions at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively, compared to preoperative assessments (p < 0.05). Specifically, both the bilateral surgery group and the MCI group exhibited substantial improvements in cognitive function at these time points (p < 0.05). Additionally, the bilateral surgery group outperformed the unilateral surgery group in cognitive function throughout the follow-up period (p < 0.05). In terms of visual function, the bilateral surgery group showed significant improvements in low spatial frequency suppression, simultaneous vision, and stereopsis at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively, compared to preoperative measurements (p < 0.05). Conclusion Both cognitive and visual functions significantly improved after cataract surgery. Bilateral cataract surgery is more effective in increasing the cognitive functions than unilateral surgery. Additionally, cataract surgery plays a critical role in facilitating cognitive recovery in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in NeuroscienceSame topicOphthalmology and Visual Impairment StudiesFrench-language works237,207