MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406047180 · doi:10.1094/phytofr-06-24-0070-fi

Pilot for Harmonization of Diagnostic Protocols for Tomato Brown Rugose Fruit Virus (ToBRFV) in Tomato and Pepper Seeds

2025· article· en· W4406047180 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Vessela Mavrodieva, Geoffrey Dennis, Beatriz Xoconostle‐Cázares, Kevin Ong, Brooke Zale, Jennifer Nickerson, E. V. Podleckis, Ángel Ramírez-Suárez, Marlene Ortíz-Berrocal, Alonso Suazo, Stephanie Bloem

Bibliographic record

VenuePhytoFrontiers™ · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Food Inspection Agency
FundersCentro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico NacionalAnimal and Plant Health Inspection ServiceConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y TecnologíaCanadian Food Inspection Agency
KeywordsPepperCapsicum annuumBiologyHorticulturePlant virusHarmonizationVirusVirologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Global seed trade is subject to various national, regional, and international regulations to prevent the introduction and spread of harmful seed-borne and seed-transmitted pathogens. When the plant health regulatory agencies of trading partners employ different diagnostic protocols for the same pathogen, contradictory test results may require additional testing that can cause delays in trade. Establishing equivalency of diagnostic protocols may expedite trade by adding confidence to diagnostic test results. The member countries of the North American Plant Protection Organization (NAPPO) conducted a project evaluating several diagnostic protocols for a seed-transmitted virus, tomato brown rugose fruit virus (ToBRFV), an emerging pathogen that has severely affected tomato and pepper fruit and seed production and trade globally. The objective of the study was to find protocols that could be harmonized among NAPPO member countries, thereby avoiding retesting of samples at different border points. The project was a collaboration between academia, industry, trade organizations, and national plant protection organizations (NPPOs). Three end-point PCR and two real-time PCR protocols were evaluated via a ring test. Nine laboratories from Canada, the United States, and Mexico participated in the ring test, which generated 3,680 data points from analytical, diagnostic, and calibrator samples. Four out of five diagnostic protocols were found to be fully transferable, and three protocols demonstrated optimal performance for accurate, reproducible, and user-friendly detection. The results of this regional effort will simplify the detection of ToBRFV-infected seeds in NAPPO member countries and demonstrate a way to establish equivalency of testing methods between the NPPOs. [Formula: see text] Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.050
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.030
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.264

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0500.030
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhytoFrontiers™Same topicPlant Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207