MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4406049567 · doi:10.1002/alz.084700

ZNF653 transcription factor activity is associated with FDG‐PET changes in AD brain‐vulnerable regions

2024· article· en· W4406049567 on OpenAlexaff
Marco De Bastiani, Guilherme Povala, Bruna Bellaver, Pâmela C.L. Ferreira, João Pedro Ferrari‐Souza, Pedro Rosa‐Neto, Bruno Zatt, Tharick A. Pascoal, Eduardo R. Zimmer

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTranscription factorNeurosciencePositron emission tomographyMedicinePsychologyBiologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging greatly impacted Alzheimer’s disease (AD) research and diagnosis. which makes predicting PET brain imaging alterations using blood data is of high interest. Additionally, integrating PET and omics data can provide new insights into AD pathophysiology. Here, we implemented a module‐based framework combining blood transcriptomics with PET to search transcription factors (TFs) activities associated with brain metabolic changes in AD. We hypothesized that integrating omics and PET data will help advance our understanding of AD neurobiology and may reveal relevant new peripheral biomarkers. Methods [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG)‐PET imaging and transcriptomics data were acquired from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). Blood microarray gene expression from ADNI, GSE63063 and GSE97760 ( https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/ ) datasets were submitted to differential expression (DE) analysis. Regulatory units (regulons) of TFs and their predicted target genes were reconstructed using the ARACNe method. Altered regulons in AD submitted gene set variation analysis to infer their TF activity prior to neuroimaging integration with [18F]FDG‐PET images using voxel‐wise eneralized linear regression (GLR) models adjusted for age, gender, years of education, and APOEε4 (RMINC package). Results Sixty‐one regulatory units were significantly enriched with altered genes in at least ⅔ of the datasets explored, and 12 were altered in all three (Figure A‐B). The voxel‐wise correlation between [18F]FDG‐PET and regulons resulted in t‐statistical maps, where uncorrected t‐value > 2.0 was used as the threshol. We observed that ZNF653 has a positive correlation with [18F]FDG‐PET in the precuneus (24.24% left, 39.51% right), medial frontal gyrus (17.26% left), medial frontal‐orbital gyrus (12.50% left) and precentral gyrus (9.08% left, 8.28% right). Interestingly, the ZNF653 regulatory unit is composed majoritarily by genes related to energetic metabolism and protein kinase activity (Figure 1C‐D). Conclusion We identified the activity of the ZNF653 regulatory unit associated with [18 F]FDG‐PET metabolism in the brain of AD individuals. Furthermore, ZNF653 activity could be modulating metabolic and protein kinase activity‐related genes, highlighting a potential role of this TF in AD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments→French-language works237,207→