Sleep in People with Dementia and Their Caregivers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is mounting evidence that difficulties with sleep including insomnia, sleep quality, and sleep fragmentation contribute to Alzheimer's disease risk including formation of beta-amyloid. Disrupted sleep is common in people with dementia (PWD). Primary unpaid caregivers (CGs) of PWD may also have disrupted sleep as a result of their caregiving roles. It is clear that CGs experience CG burden, stress and depression. The interplay of CG-PWD dyads and the impact of behavior, cognition and sleep in the PWD on the CG are relatively understudied. METHOD: Eight dyads consisting of individuals diagnosed with Alzheimer's Disease (AD) (PWD) and their CGs were recruited from the Virginia Alzheimer's Disease Center (VADC) Clinical Cohort. Diagnosis of AD in the VADC cohort was made by team consensus using neuroimaging, biomarker, neurological and neuropsychological data. All participants had wrist actigraphy measured for 14 days and overnight polysomnography (PSG) done in a sleep lab. Dyad members were in separate rooms during PSG. Dyads members independently completed the Montreal Cognitive Assessment 12, the Geriatric Depression Scale 13, Epworth Sleepiness Scale 14, and the Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease scale 15 (QOL). CGs only completed the Preparedness for Caregiving Scale 16 and the Zarit Burden Interview and the Neuropsychiatric inventory. RESULT: Neither activity nor rest over 14 days differed within dyads. Relative to PWD, CGs experienced shorter total sleep, lower sleep efficiency, and longer sleep onset. CG and PWD depression and QOL did not differ between dyad members. Importantly, poorer CG sleep was associated with higher CG burden and greater PWD neuropsychiatric symptoms but not with degree of cognitive impairment in the PWD. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that sleep in CGs can be more impaired than the PWDs they are caring for even when sleeping separately. Importantly, behavioral disturbance may be more problematic than PWD cognitive impairment level in CG sleep. These may have implications for ability to care for the PWD potentially impacting nursing home placement. Furthermore, PWD sleep characteristics may impact longer-term CG health and well-being.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".