MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4406051283 · doi:10.1002/alz.093345

Synergism between Lewy body and Alzheimer’s disease pathology differs by sex

2024· article· en· W4406051283 on OpenAlexaff
Madeline Wood Alexander, Lisa L. Barnes, Julie A. Schneider, Kaitlin B. Casaletto, Jennifer S. Rabin

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLewy bodyDementiaDiseaseLewy body diseasePathologyAlzheimer's diseaseMenopausePsychologyMedicineDementia with Lewy bodiesInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Parkinson's disease and dementia with Lewy bodies are more common in men, while Alzheimer's disease (AD) is more common in women. Lewy body disease (LBD) and AD pathologies are highly comorbid and may be mechanistically linked. It remains unclear whether LBD and AD co-pathology manifest differently across sexes. Here, we investigated sex differences in associations of LBD with β-amyloid and tau. We also tested whether age at menopause modifies the relationship between LBD and AD pathology in women. METHOD: We used data from autopsied participants in the Religious Orders Study, Memory and Aging Project, and Minority Aging Research Study cohorts. Immunohistochemistry was used to quantify LBD stage, β-amyloid, and tau. To capture cortical LBD pathology, LBD stage was dichotomized as neocortical-type/limbic-type vs. nigral-predominant/none. Linear regressions tested interactive effects of 1) sex and LBD on AD pathology in the entire sample and 2) age at menopause and LBD on AD pathology among female participants who reported natural menopause, adjusting for age at death and APOE4. RESULTS: We included N = 1,798 participants (mean (SD) age at death = 89.5 (6.74) years, N (%) female = 1,225 (68.1)). Between sexes, men exhibited more LBD pathology after adjusting for β-amyloid and tau (β = 0.31, p = .02), while women showed a greater burden of both β-amyloid (β = -0.10, p = .002) and tau (β = -0.08, p = .01) after adjusting for LBD. There was an interaction between sex and LBD on tau but not β-amyloid, such that women with LBD had more tau than men with LBD after adjusting for β-amyloid (male sex*β-amyloid: β = 0.03, p = .7; male sex*tau: β = -0.16, p = .03; Figure 1). In women with natural menopause, age at menopause modified the association of LBD with tau, such that women with earlier menopause had greater tau burden in the presence of LBD (β = -0.03, p = .003; Figure 2). Post hoc analyses showed that the interactions between 1) sex and LBD on tau and 2) age at menopause and LBD on tau were driven mainly by neocortical-type LBD and not limbic-type LBD. CONCLUSION: LBD pathology might have a more pronounced impact on tau vulnerability in women than men. Female hormonal processes may further modify the relationship between LBD pathology and tau.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→French-language works237,207→