MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4406051306 · doi:10.1002/alz.091539

Examining the associations between Alzheimer disease, Lewy body, and TDP‐43 neuropathology with mild behavioral impairment: a clinicopathological study of older adults

2024· article· en· W4406051306 on OpenAlexaff
Sergio Fernandez Sharif, Dylan X. Guan, Eric E. Smith, Zahinoor Ismail

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsHotchkiss Brain InstituteUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuropathologyDementiaLewy bodyHazard ratioOdds ratioAlzheimer's diseaseDiseaseConfidence intervalMedicineDementia with Lewy bodiesPsychologyPsychiatryGerontologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The utility of neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) for early detection of AD and/or other neuropathologies is not fully understood, with concerns regarding specificity. Mild behavioral impairment (MBI) is a syndrome identifying persons at risk for incident cognitive decline and dementia by leveraging risk associated with later-life emergent and persistent NPS. Here, in dementia-free individuals at baseline, we examined whether AD, Lewy body (LB), and/or transactive response DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43) pathology at autopsy were associated with the presence of MBI five years before death. METHOD: National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center participants (n = 1016) were included. Using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Questionnaire, three NPS statuses were derived: MBI, NPSnoMBI, or noNPS. Proteinopathy presence/absence was determined using published guidelines. Adjusted multinomial logistic regressions modeled pathology-NPS status associations. Adjusted Cox proportional hazards regressions modeled hazard for AD-dementia at each NPS status level, including interaction terms with cognitive status and each co-pathology. RESULT: Participant characteristics are presented in Table 1. AD+ individuals were 88.4% more likely to be MBI+ in the five years before death than AD- (odds ratio (OR):1.88, 95% confidence interval (CI):1.29-2.75, p<0.01); NPSnoMBI did not differ from noNPS (OR:1.22, CI:0.90-1.66, p = 0.20). No significant associations were seen for either co-pathology, even in an AD-only stratum. Among MBI progressors to dementia (n = 137), 43.8% were solely AD+ and 32.8% were mixed AD+/LB+. MBI individuals had a 2.03-fold greater progression rate to AD-dementia than noNPS (CI: 1.60-2.57, p<0.01). NPSnoMBI did not differ from noNPS (OR:1.22, CI:0.90-1.66, p = 0.20). Progression rates to AD-dementia among MBI+ who had limbic LBs at autopsy were significantly greater than those without (HR:2.56, CI:1.09-6.06, p<0.05). No significant interaction was noted for TDP-43. Progression rates to dementia were higher in MCI, but the effect of MBI on progression was greater for NC (HR:3.05, CI:1.37-6.80, p<0.01) vs. MCI (HR:1.93, CI:1.51-2.47, p<0.01). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that those with autopsy-confirmed AD-but not other common proteinopathies-are more likely to be preceded by MBI than by NPSnoMBI or noNPS in the five years before death. Among those with MBI, the presence of LB might serve as an important co-pathology in the development of AD dementia. By extension to postmortem diagnosis, these results reinforce the utility of MBI in AD-related dementia prognostication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→French-language works237,207→