Effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation on cognitive and swallowing function in patients with MCI and dysphagia risk: a randomized controlled trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a high-risk factor for dementia and dysphagia; therefore, early intervention is vital. The effectiveness of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) targeting the right dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex (rDLPFC) remains unclear. METHODS: Thirty-six participants with MCI were randomly allocated to receive real (n = 18) or sham (n = 18) iTBS. Global cognitive function was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and executive function was evaluated with the Trail Making Test (TMT), Digital span test (DST) and Stroop color word test (SCWT). Quantitative swallowing measurements were obtained using temporal and kinetic parameters based on the videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS). Resting-state functional magnetic imaging (fMRI) was performed to observe brain plasticity, functional connectivity (FC) values were calculated. All assessments were completed at baseline and two weeks after treatment. Participants received 10 sessions of daily robotic navigated iTBS. RESULTS: The MoCA score and the SCWT duration of the real group improved significantly compared with that of the sham group. Temporal parameters of VFSS included 5-ml oral transit time (OTT), 5-ml soft palate elevation time (SET) and 10-ml OTT showed a decreasing trend. However, there was significant improvement in 10-ml OTT when choosing patients with OTT exceeding 1000 ms. FC value between the left middle frontal gyrus and the rDLPFC increased significantly in real stimulation group (p < 0.05 with false discovery rate corrected). We found that baseline FC scores were negatively correlated with the SCWT task duration (r = -0.554, p = 0.017) and with the 10-ml OTT (rho = -0.442, p = 0.027) across all participants. Among those in the iTBS group with a pre-10-ml OTT greater than 1000 ms, we observed a positive correlation between changes in MoCA scores and changes in FC values (r = 0.789, p = 0.035). Furthermore, changes in MoCA scores were positively correlated with changes in 10-ml OTT (r = 0.648, p = 0.031), as determined by Pearson analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Navigated iTBS over the rDLPFC has the potential to improve global cognition, response inhibition ability, and certain aspects of swallowing function for patients with MCI at high risk for dysphagia. Changes in FC between right and left DLPFC may underlie the neural mechanisms responsible for the effectiveness of iTBS targeting the right DLPFC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".