Analisis Potensi Pengembangan Ekowisata Danau Laut Tinggal, Sumatera Barat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Danau Laut Tinggal adalah salah satu danau di Sumatra Barat yang memiliki potensi ekowisata jika dapat dikelola dengan baik. Karenanya diperlukan rencana pengelolaan ekowisata kawasan yang meliputi kesesuaian wisata, keanekaragaman hayati di sepanjang jalur pendakian dan di sekitar danau, dan kesiapan masyarakat untuk pengembangan ekowisata di Kawasan Danau Laut Tinggal. Metode yang dilakukan meliputi penilaian kelayakan obyek daya tarik wisata, analisis kesesuaian wisata perairan danau, inventarisasi fauna dan keanekaragaman hayati, dan analisis kesiapan masyarakat. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bawah Danau Laut Tinggal sesuai untuk dijadikan ekowisata, didukung dengan kesiapan masyarakat untuk ikut serta dilibatkan dalam pengelolaan ekowisata dan ditemukannya berbagai keanekaragaman hayati berupa 60 jenis flora, 13 jenis mamalia, dan 29 jenis avifauna yang diantaranya satwa terancam punah seperti Rangkong, Elang Ularbido, dan Owa. Kata kunci: danau laut tinggal, ekowisata, keanekaragaman hayati, kesiapan masyarakat, pengelolaan
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".