MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406079829 · doi:10.1016/j.jtct.2024.12.024

Impact of Underlying Disease and Total Body Irradiation on the Incidence of Graft-Versus-Host Disease After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

2025· article· en· W4406079829 on OpenAlexaff
Robert Puckrin, Megan Kinzel, Douglas A. Stewart, Ahsan Chaudhry, Kareem Jamani, Jan Storek

Bibliographic record

VenueTransplantation and Cellular Therapy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Canadian institutionsCalgary Laboratory ServicesUniversity of CalgaryAlberta Health Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTotal body irradiationDiseaseIncidence (geometry)TransplantationHematopoietic cellGraft-versus-host diseaseHost (biology)Hematopoietic stem cell transplantationHaematopoiesisMedicineImmunologyBiologyStem cellInternal medicineGeneticsChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multiple factors have been described to influence the risk of acute or chronic graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD or cGVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), including underlying chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and high-dose total body irradiation (TBI). However, the impact of the underlying disease or low-dose TBI on the risk of GVHD in the modern era has not been determined. The objective of this study was to determine risk factors for GVHD in the modern era in the setting of antithymocyte globulin (ATG)-based GVHD prophylaxis. This retrospective study included 1219 patients with hematologic malignancy who underwent first peripheral blood allogeneic HCT using myeloablative fludarabine and busulfan conditioning ± low-dose total body irradiation, along with ATG, cyclosporine, and methotrexate as GVHD prophylaxis. The adjusted cumulative incidence of GVHD was compared between patient subgroups using multivariable competing risks regression. When disregarding the underlying disease, risk factors for grade 2-4 aGVHD were donor type other than matched sibling donor (non-MSD) and lack of low-dose TBI (non-TBI). Risk factors for grade 3-4 aGVHD were non-MSD, non-TBI, and CMV donor negative/recipient positive serostatus (D-R+). Risk factors for moderate-severe cGVHD were ≤9/10 HLA match, non-male/male donor/recipient sex, and non-TBI. In models including the underlying disease, additional significant risk factors were chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) for grade 2 to 4 aGVHD (sub-hazard ratio over acute myeloid leukemia [SHR] 3.16, 95% CI 1.97-5.08, P < .001); CLL and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) for grade 3-4 aGVHD (SHR for CLL 3.54, 95% CI 1.54-8.17, P = .003 and SHR for ALL 2.26, 95% CI 1.26-4.04, P = .006); and myelofibrosis (MF) for moderate-severe cGVHD (SHR 2.14, 95 CI 1.34-3.41, P = .001). In the modern era when using ATG for GVHD prophylaxis, newly identified risk factors include CLL and non-TBI for grade 2-4 aGVHD; CLL, ALL, and non-TBI for grade 3-4 aGVHD; and MF and non-TBI for moderate-severe cGVHD. These findings, if confirmed in a separate cohort, should be taken into consideration when tailoring the prophylaxis and monitoring of GVHD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueTransplantation and Cellular TherapySame topicHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationFrench-language works237,207