Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study on Older Patients with Cognitive Impairment and Depression
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Understanding brain changes in older patients with depression and their relationship with cognitive abilities may aid in the diagnosis of depression in this population. This study aimed to explore the association between brain lesions and cognitive performance in older patients with depression. METHODS: We utilized magnetic resonance imaging data from a previous study, which included older adults with and without depression. Smoothed Regional Homogeneity (ReHo) and local brain Amplitude of Low-frequency Fluctuation (ALFF) values were assessed to examine brain activity. RESULTS: The analysis revealed decreased ReHo in the left middle temporal gyrus, left middle frontal gyrus, and left precuneus, as well as increased local ALFF in the right middle occipital gyrus, left postcentral gyrus, and right precentral gyrus in older patients with depression. These alterations may contribute to behavioral and cognitive changes. However, no significant relationship was found between ReHo values and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores. In contrast, increased local ALFF in the left postcentral gyrus and right precentral gyrus was negatively correlated with MoCA scores. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated a significant association between regional brain alterations in patients with depression and cognitive behavior. Thus, this work identified functional brain regions and cognitive performance in older adults with depression, highlighting specific brain regions that play a crucial role in cognitive abilities in this population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".