Foreign economic activity of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic in the second half of the 90s of the XX century
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Since the mid-90s of the twentieth century, the authorities of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic have increased overseas economic activity as a means of overcoming the economic crisis. The positive results of the activities of the authorities of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic in this area were: the establishment of the Ministry of Foreign Relations of the Kabardino-Balkarian Repub-lic; the re-establishment of the Department of Foreign Economic Relations within it; the conclu-sion of interstate agreements with the Government of the Republic of Abkhazia, the Government of the Republic of Turkey and the Government of the Republic of Turkmenistan. Economic ties between the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic and the Commonwealth of Independent States began to develop. The number of joint Russian-foreign companies registered in the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic grew. Contracts were signed with large companies from Italy, Cyprus, Canada, France and China. Nevertheless, the success of joint ventures in the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic in the second half of the 1990s turned out to be insignificant, which was due to the strict federal tax and credit policies that hampered the development of production activities, the fall of the ruble ex-change rate and the military conflict in Chechnya, which caused a significant decrease in the in-vestment attractiveness of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic and the entire North Caucasus at the international level.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it