Évanghélia Stead, Goethe’s Faust I Outlined – Moritz Retzsch’s Prints in Circulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
vanghlia Stead retrace, dans Goethe's Faust I Outlined -Moritz Retzsch's Prints in Circulation, les mtamorphoses successives -entre mdiums et cultures -des vingt-six eaux fortes de Faust 1, ralises par l'artiste Moritz Retzsch selon la technique du dessin au trait (outline, en anglais), et publies en 1816 en Allemagne.Avec une extrme minutie historique, fonde sur un retour aux sources primaires, et aux archives, l'auteure y dmle -autant que faire se peut -les circulations europennes de ces estampes, entre leur apparition et le dbut du XX e sicle.Cet ensemble restreint de gravures -qui semblent porter en elles-mmes, par leur conomie de moyens, toutes les potentialits de mouvement et de rsilience -est tudi selon une alternance de perspectives : entre de vastes horizons spatio-temporels -de multiples pays, sur des dcennies -, et une attention scrupuleuse aux dtails -au plus prs des objets, de leur matrialit.Dans leur diffusion, ces images sont copies, transfres, rendues hybrides, comme emportes par la culture imprime, et mdiatique, de l'Europe du XIX e sicle.Le parti pris consiste donc -par-del la rhabilitation d'un artiste relativement oubli tudier les reproductions de Retzsch de la faon la plus large possible -les copies constituant, plus que les estampes originales, le vritable sujet de l'ouvrage.Les ditions pirates peuvent tre luxueuses ou populaires, mais elles sont ce par quoi ces dessins au trait circulent.L'auteure tudie ainsi leurs r-inventions, dans diffrents
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".