MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Microplastics in the benthic fish from the Canadian St. Lawrence River and Estuary: Occurrence, spatial distribution and ecological risk assessment

2025· article· en· W4406090793 on OpenAlexafffundabout
A. H. M. Enamul Kabir, Elisa Michon, Marc Mingelbier, Dominique Robert, Youssouf Djibril Soubaneh, Huixiang Xie, Zhe Lu

Bibliographic record

VenueMarine Pollution Bulletin · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicroplastics and Plastic Pollution
Canadian institutionsMinistère des Ressources naturelles et des ForêtsUniversité du Québec à Rimouski
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsCanada Foundation for InnovationUniversité du Québec à Rimouski
KeywordsEstuaryMicroplasticsFisheryBenthic zoneEnvironmental scienceSpatial distributionFish <Actinopterygii>Distribution (mathematics)OceanographyGeographyEcologyBiologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microplastic contamination in the St. Lawrence River and Estuary (SLRE), Canada, poses potential risks to aquatic species. However, limited understanding of microplastic contamination in benthic fish, potentially more vulnerable than pelagic species, impedes effective risk assessment in this crucial ecosystem. This study addressed knowledge gaps by analyzing microplastics in the gastrointestinal tracts (GIT) and gills of Channel Catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) and Atlantic Tomcod (Microgadus tomcod) in the SLRE. Forty-two fish from ten stations were examined using KOH digestion, density separation, wet-peroxidation, and spectroscopy. Results indicated an average abundance of 3.0 ± 0.4 (mean ± SE) microplastic particles per individual fish. Most detected particles were small microplastics (<809 μm) and fibers, with blue and transparent colors. Major polymers identified included polyethylene terephthalate and polyethylene. While catfish showed higher microplastic abundances per individual than tomcod, data based on GIT weight do not support microplastic biomagnification in this predator-prey relationship. Catfish from downstream of Québec City showed elevated levels of microplastics and more variations in their characteristics compared to average abundance found from a site located 50 km upstream. Urban activity may increase microplastic accumulation in downstream benthic fish and others. This highlights the need for further studies on the migratory capacities of fish species. Ecological risk assessment revealed medium to high-risks for the catfish stations close to the Québec City due to the prevalence of smaller microplastics <809 μm and highly toxic polymers (polymethyl methacrylate, polyvinylchloride, polyurethane, acrylonitrile butadiene styrene). This study provides a baseline for monitoring plastic pollution in the SLRE fish and assessing ecological risks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.103
Threshold uncertainty score0.208

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMarine Pollution BulletinSame topicMicroplastics and Plastic PollutionFrench-language works237,207