MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406099291 · doi:10.1144/m57-2023-22

East Siberian Sea–Chukchi Sea Prograded Margin Tectono-Sedimentary Element and Makarov Oceanic Basin Composite Tectono-Sedimentary Element, Siberian and Central Arctic

2025· article· en· W4406099291 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
P. Rekant, Alisa I. Boldyreva, S. Shkarubo

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Society London Memoirs · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologySedimentary depositional environmentPaleontologySedimentary rockContinental marginSiliciclasticContinental shelfCanada BasinPassive marginCretaceousStructural basinGeomorphologyOceanographyRiftTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The East Siberian Sea–Chukchi Sea Prograded Margin (ESCPM) and the Makarov Oceanic Basin (MOB) include interconnected sedimentary accumulations with gradual facies transitions that occupy a significant part of the Amerasia Basin and the adjacent Siberian Arctic continental margin. The ESCPM contains a succession of Cenozoic clinothem featuring shelf-margin progradation caused by a rapid influx of siliciclastic material from NE Asia into the adjacent Amerasia Basin, and represents a single tectono-sedimentary element (TSE) as per the volume's terminology. The MOB is a most distant part of the Arctic Ocean and is isolated from continental depositional systems. It consists of two first-order sedimentary accumulations with distinct depositional styles and provenances. The lower, Passive Margin TSE is composed of a fragment of the presumably Paleozoic–Mesozoic Barents and North Kara passive continental margin. The upper, Synoceanic TSE was formed following the separation of the continental block of the Lomonosov Ridge from the Eurasian continental margin at c. 56 Ma and during the opening of the Eurasian Basin. It includes mostly Eocene–Holocene hemipelagic and pelagic deposits and ice-rafted sediments. Each of these accumulations is characterized as a TSE, and the MOB itself is considered as a composite TSE. Assessments of petroleum potential in both elements rely on regional geological constraints, sedimentary architecture and modelling. Direct hydrocarbon indicators have been detected in seismic profiles in both the ESCPM and the MOB. In the latter, petroleum generation is likely to have begun in the Jurassic or Late Cretaceous, peaking in the Paleocene and possibly extending into the Miocene. Reservoir rocks are inferred in Cretaceous and Cenozoic strata. In the ESCPM TSE, Paleocene–middle Eocene sedimentary successions are considered to include potential source rocks, associated with main flooding surfaces and clinothem bottomset deposits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.133
Threshold uncertainty score0.265

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeological Society London MemoirsSame topicGeological Studies and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207