MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406101411 · doi:10.1007/s44337-025-00189-w

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy and associated factors among patients attending Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital, Southwestern Uganda: a cross-sectional study

2025· article· en· W4406101411 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Victor Muyambi, David Collins Agaba, Ronald Ouma Omolo, Jimmy Odongo Ogwal, Okello Samuel, John Semuwemba, Richard Migisha

Bibliographic record

VenueDiscover Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDiabetes mellitusPeripheral neuropathyCross-sectional studyInternal medicineDiabetic neuropathyReferralPoisson regressionAmputationComplicationSurgeryPediatricsPhysical therapyPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a microvascular complication of diabetes mellitus (DM), that is associated with increased risks of morbidity and disability, especially ulceration and amputation. Timely identification, diagnosis, and management of DPN are crucial to prevent amputations, mitigate disabilities, and enhance the quality of life for persons with diabetes. We determined the prevalence and factors associated with peripheral neuropathy among patients with diabetes at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital (MRRH), southwestern Uganda. We conducted a cross-sectional study at the Diabetic Clinic of MRRH from November 2023 to January 2024. We used an interviewer-administered questionnaire to obtain data on socio-demographic and medical characteristics, and used the Toronto Clinical Scoring System (TCSS) tool to determine DPN and its severity. Levels/stages of neuropathy were grouped basing on the score as no neuropathy (0–5), mild neuropathy (6–8), moderate neuropathy (9–11), and severe neuropathy ≥ 12. Modified Poisson regression, with robust standard errors was used to evaluate associations between DPN and independent variables. In total, 355 participants were enrolled with mean age 55.94 ± 13.43 years. Most participants were female (60%). The prevalence of DPN was 38.03% (n = 135; 95% CI 33.11–43.21%). Having high blood pressure of > 138/80 mmHg (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] = 2.73, 95% CI 1.80–4.13), longer duration of diabetes of ≥ 6 years (aPR = 2.01 95% CI 1.46–2.75), being aged ≥ 60 years (aPR = 1.49, 95%CI 1.04–2.13) and having fasting blood sugar > 7mmol/l (aPR = 1.96 95% CI 1.34–2.90) were independently associated with DPN. Approximately one in three DM patients surveyed had DPN. Hypertension, longer diabetes duration, advanced age, and high fasting blood sugar were associated with DPN. Timely detection and targeted interventions, particularly for individuals with modifiable risk factors like hypertension and poor glucose control, could play a crucial role in preventing or delaying the progression of DPN in this setting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.963

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiscover MedicineSame topicPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207