Global Insights into Cultured Meat: Uncovering Production Processes, Potential Hazards, Regulatory Frameworks, and Key Challenges—A Scoping Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This scoping review aims to understand the cell-based meat production process, including the regulations, potential hazards, and critical points of this production. This review includes studies on cultured meat production processes, health hazards, and regulatory guidelines, excluding those without hazard analysis, incomplete texts, or studies published before 2013. The search was performed in eight electronic databases (MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, LILACS, and Google Scholar) using MeSH terms and adaptations for each database. The search for local studies on regulations and guideline documents was complemented by a manual search on the websites of governments and regulatory agencies from different regions (e.g., FDA, FAO, EFSA, USDA, Health Canada, EC, EU, ANVISA/Brazil, MAPA/Brazil, FSANZ, and SFA). This step involved reading full texts to confirm eligibility and extract key data, including author, year, country, study design, objectives, results, cultured meat protocols, health hazards, and hazard control measures, followed by data analysis. A comprehensive search of the databases yielded 1185 studies and 46 regulatory or guidance documents. After removing duplicate studies and applying eligibility criteria to titles, abstracts and full texts, 35 studies and 45 regulatory or guidance documents were included. The cultured meat production protocols are well-established, highlighting potential hazards and critical control points. Although guidance documents and regulations are limited, they are expanding globally. The development and commercialization of cultured meat require clear, and up-to-date regulations and supervision, which are being studied and formulated by regulatory agencies worldwide. Cultured meat production presents some potential hazards (chemical, biological, and physical) that require food safety considerations: (i) genetic stability of cells/cell lines; (ii) microbiological hazards related to cell lines; (iii) exposure to substances used in the production process; (iv) toxicity and allergenicity of the product or its component for the population; (v) post-harvest microbiological contamination; (vi) chemical contamination/residue levels; and (vii) nutritional aspects/risks. Currently, no standardized testing approach exists for cultured meat. However, effective hazard and safety assessment strategies, such as HACCP combined with best practices, should be implemented throughout the production process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".