Evaluation of the sensitivity of a federally endangered freshwater mussel (<i>Venustaconcha trabalis</i>) to selected chemicals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Protection of critically endangered species requires identification of factors limiting their survival and growth. Previous studies have demonstrated that unionid mussels are sensitive to some chemicals, and the sensitivity was similar among different taxonomic families and tribes of mussels. However, common species of mussels were generally used in these previous studies; little is known about the sensitivity of endangered and threatened mussels relative to common species. The objective of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity of a critically endangered mussel (Tennessee bean, Venustaconcha trabalis) to seven chemicals with different modes of toxic action (ammonia, chloride, nitrite, potassium, cobalt, manganese, nickel) in acute 96-hr exposures and to three chemicals (nitrite, cobalt, iron) in chronic 28-day exposures conducted following standard methods. A commonly tested mussel (fatmucket, Lampsilis siliquoidea) was also tested side-by-side with Tennessee bean in chronic exposures. Test chemicals were selected based on (1) chemicals of potential concern found in a review of existing data for the river where a population of Tennessee bean occurs or was historically present, (2) chemicals to which other mussels are sensitive, or (3) chemicals that had not been previously tested with mussels. Acute 50% effect concentrations (EC50s) for the seven chemicals from the Tennessee bean tests were within or close to the range of EC50s for other mussel species tested in previous studies, and chronic EC20s for the three chemicals were similar between Tennessee bean and fatmucket, indicating the endangered species has sensitivity similar to other tested mussel species. Inclusion of the new mussel data in existing toxicity databases for freshwater organisms would rank one or more mussel species among the four most sensitive species to ammonia, chloride, potassium, and nickel in acute exposures and to nitrite, cobalt, and iron in chronic exposures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".