MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406117396 · doi:10.35848/1347-4065/ada659

Thermal stability enhancement in perovskite solar cells using W-doped ZnO/single crystalline anatase TiO<sub>2</sub> nanoparticle bilayer

2025· article· en· W4406117396 on OpenAlexaff
Munkhtuul Gantumur, Md. Shahiduzzaman, Mohammad Ismail Hossain, Masahiro Nakano, Makoto Karakawa, Koji Tomita, Jean‐Michel Nunzi, Md. Akhtaruzzaman, Hamad F. Alharbi, Tetsuya Taima

Bibliographic record

VenueJapanese Journal of Applied Physics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPerovskite Materials and Applications
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersKing Saud University
KeywordsBilayerMaterials scienceAnataseAnnealing (glass)DopingPerovskite (structure)Energy conversion efficiencyThermal stabilityChemical engineeringOptoelectronicsNanotechnologyChemistryPhotocatalysisComposite materialCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The interface between the electron transport layer (ETL) and the perovskite layer is essential for fabricating efficient and stable perovskite solar cells (PSCs). In this study, we introduced a bilayer ETL of W-doped ZnO and single crystalline anatase TiO 2 nanoparticles (average diameter = 6–10 nm) to mitigate the degradation between W-doped ZnO ETL and MA-containing perovskite layer. After 12 h of annealing at 85 °C, the perovskite grown on the bilayer exhibited strong perovskite peaks, indicating a significant slowdown in decomposition. Moreover, the bilayer device demonstrated superior thermal stability, retaining over 60% of their initial power conversion efficiency (PCE) after 24 h of annealing, while the W-doped ZnO single-layer device lost all efficiency. PSCs with the W-doped ZnO/Anatase TiO 2 bilayer achieved PCE of 16.63%, compared to 11.88% for the W-doped ZnO single layer. This bilayer application offers a promising pathway for improving both the efficiency and stability for perovskite-based optoelectronic devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.132
Threshold uncertainty score0.708

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJapanese Journal of Applied PhysicsSame topicPerovskite Materials and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207