METAHEURISTIC-BASED TUNING OF PROPORTIONAL-DERIVATIVE LEARNING RULES FOR PROPORTIONAL-INTEGRAL FUZZY CONTROLLERS IN TOWER CRANE SYSTEM PAYLOAD POSITION CONTROL
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper proposes the use of metaheuristic optimization algorithms to tune the Proportional-Derivative (PD) learning rules within the framework of Iterative Learning Control applied to low-cost Takagi-Sugeno Proportional-Integral (PI)-fuzzy controllers for tower crane system payload position control. Four PD learning rules are considered: direct rule with current (in the iteration domain) control error, direct rule with previous control error, indirect rule, and open-closed-loop rule. The fuzzy controllers are tuned by the Extended Symmetrical Optimum method applied to the linear PI controllers, and then by the modal equivalence principle. Set-point filters are included for overshoot reduction. A unified design approach is formulated for all four PD learning rules in terms of optimally computing the gains in the iteration domain using metaheuristic optimization algorithms that solve optimization problems with objective functions expressed as the sum of the squared control error multiplied by time, where the two variables are the parameters of the PD learning rules. Seven popular metaheuristic optimization algorithms are implemented. Real-time experimental results from ten iterations of these optimization algorithms support the performance comparison of the fuzzy control systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it