MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406122225 · doi:10.1016/j.gimo.2024.101959

Association of HFE genotypes with hemochromatosis-related phenotypes in the All of Us research program

2025· article· en· W4406122225 on OpenAlexaff
Nandana D. Rao, Ramal Moonesinghe, Paul C. Adams, Gail P. Jarvik, Kris V. Kowdley, Laura A. Schieve, Scott D. Grosse, W. David Dotson, Muin J. Khoury

Bibliographic record

VenueGenetics in Medicine Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIron Metabolism and Disorders
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersOak Ridge Institute for Science and EducationCenters for Disease Control and PreventionNational Institutes of HealthProtagonist TherapeuticsU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsHemochromatosisPhenotypeGenotypeHereditary hemochromatosisAssociation (psychology)GeneticsMedicineBiologyPsychologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: variation with HH-related phenotypes and assess the prevalence of testing and diagnosis of HH using All of Us data. Methods: genotypes, we examined the prevalence of HH diagnosis codes and related biochemical and clinical phenotypes. Results: = .0001). Of the 71 participants who were p.Cys282Tyr homozygotes with indication of liver disease, 32 (45.1%) did not have a serum transferrin-iron saturation measure, and 37 (52.1%) did not have diagnosis codes for HH. Conclusion: Limited serum transferrin-iron saturation measures or HH diagnosis codes among p.Cys282Tyr homozygotes, even those with liver disease, suggests potential undertesting and underdiagnosis of type 1 HH in clinical practice and a need for improved awareness, education, and testing around HH.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.367 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenetics in Medicine OpenSame topicIron Metabolism and DisordersFrench-language works237,207