MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4406130520 · doi:10.1177/07067437241300961

High Intensity Physician-Based Service Use for Mental Health Concerns in a General-Population Sample of Children and Youth: Utilisation des services de haute intensité dispensés par des médecins pour les problèmes de santé mentale dans un échantillon d’enfants et de jeunes de la population générale

2025· article· en· W4406130520 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Jordan Edwards, Li Wang, Anne Fuller, Kelly K. Anderson, Claire de Oliveira, Katholiki Georgiades

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMental Health Treatment and Access
Canadian institutionsMental Health Research CanadaWestern UniversityUniversity of TorontoLawson Health Research InstituteMcMaster University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanada Research ChairsMinistère de l’Éducation, Gouvernement de l’OntarioOntario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care
KeywordsMedicineMental healthPopulationPercentileEmergency departmentFamily medicineHealth careOccupational safety and healthGerontologyPsychiatryEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To examine factors associated with high intensity physician-based mental health care services in a population-based sample of children and youth in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: = 1,423) included children and youth with at least one physician-based contact for a mental health concern in the 24-month period post-OCHS. Over the same follow-up period, we classified high intensity service use as those in the top 10th and fifth percentiles of physician-based mental health service cost contributors. Costs were assessed using physician billing data, as well as estimated emergency department visit and hospitalization costs. RESULTS: Among those with at least one contact, being older (PR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.04, 1.25), having more severe symptoms of mental ill-health (PR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.06) and having a history of mental health service use (PR: 3.99, 95% CI: 1.37, 11.61), were positively associated with high-intensity service use, while living in a rural setting (PR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.15, 0.30) was negatively associated. Findings were largely consistent between the top 10th and fifth percentiles. Notably, among youth ages 14-17 years, self-reported prior suicide attempt was positively associated with high-intensity (top fifth percentile) service use (PR: 6.09, 95% CI: 1.41, 26.26). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest older age, non-rural residency, mental health symptom severity and suicidal behaviour are important factors associated with high-intensity physician-based mental health service use. Our findings will inform efforts to better identify children and youth who may benefit from early and personalized interventions. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY TITLE: Understanding Children and Youth with the Greatest Mental Health Related Service Needs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.697
Threshold uncertainty score0.611

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Psychiatry→Same topicMental Health Treatment and Access→French-language works237,207→