MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406132388 · doi:10.54796/njb.v12i2.332

Molecular characterization, DNA fingerprinting and genetic diversity analysis of Nepalese rice landraces using SSR markers

2024· article· en· W4406132388 on OpenAlexaff
Bal Krishna Joshi, Ruja Pokhrel, Raju Chaudhary

Bibliographic record

VenueNepal Journal of Biotechnology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Genetic and Mutation Studies
Canadian institutionsGlobal Institute for Water Security
FundersNepal Agricultural Research Council
KeywordsGenetic diversityOryza sativaMicrosatelliteBiologyEx situ conservationBiotechnologyGenetic variationDNA profilingAgricultureIn situ conservationAlleleAgronomyGeneticsPopulationEcologyDNAMedicineGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rice (Oryza sativa) is the major crop of Nepal. Genetic diversity studies in rice have been conducted extensively with collections from various parts of the world, including Nepal. However, local landraces in these collections are explored on a very limited scale for novel genetic variations. The availability of wild relatives of Oryza sativa has increased interest in understanding the genetic makeup of Nepalese rice landraces. This study aimed to identify the variability in 80 rice landraces using 19 simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. The collection represented geographical regions suitable for rice farming in Nepal. DNA fingerprints of some landraces showed clear distinctions. The results indicated significant genetic differentiation among the rice landraces, with a possible formation of two distinct clusters. Among 19 SSR markers, only 12 have shown polymorphism. The lowest allele frequency was observed in the Tauli Satara landrace. The maximum heterozygosity was observed from the sample collected from Pyuthan district. The first coordinate explained 18.81% of the variation, while the second coordinate explained 13.16%. Overall, these findings will benefit rice breeders and conservationists in selecting parent material, managing conservation efforts both on-farm and ex-situ, and linking genetic diversity with geographical locations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.891
Threshold uncertainty score0.125

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNepal Journal of BiotechnologySame topicPlant Genetic and Mutation StudiesFrench-language works237,207