A quarter-century of contributions to tourism scholarship: tracing historical themes and citation patterns in current issues in tourism
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research delves into the intellectual underpinnings and citation performance of Current Issues in Tourism (CIT) over the past 25 years. It uses bibliometric methodology, content analysis, negative binomial regression, and quantile regression to answer its five research questions. This multi-pronged research revealed significant contributions made by the CIT to the tourism domain. We present three key contributions: delineating the journal’s major themes, analyzing thematic evolution over time, and understanding citation drivers. By identifying the dominant themes within the journal, this study provides valuable insight for prospective authors. It also explores thematic evolution within the journal, which sheds light on emerging and declining areas of interest. This knowledge can be invaluable for researchers seeking to position their work at the forefront of the discipline. The negative binomial and quantile regression analysis offer further contributions, identifying and evaluating variables associated with an article’s citation count. This information provides valuable guidance for aspiring researchers seeking to maximise the reach and impact of their publications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it