De novo and inherited dominant variants in U4 and U6 snRNAs cause retinitis pigmentosa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT The U4 small nuclear RNA (snRNA) forms a duplex with the U6 snRNA and, together with U5 and ∼30 proteins, is part of the U4/U6.U5 tri-snRNP complex, located at the core of the major spliceosome. Recently, recurrent de novo variants in the U4 RNA, transcribed from the RNU4-2 gene, and in at least two other RNU genes were discovered to cause neurodevelopmental disorder. We detected inherited and de novo heterozygous variants in RNU4-2 (n.18_19insA and n.56T>C) and in four out of the five RNU6 paralogues (n.55_56insG and n.56_57insG) in 135 individuals from 62 families with non-syndromic retinitis pigmentosa (RP), a rare form of hereditary blindness. We show that these variants are recurrent among RP families and invariably cluster in close proximity within the three-way junction (between stem-I, the 5’ stem-loop and stem-II) of the U4/U6 duplex, affecting its natural conformation. Interestingly, this region binds to numerous splicing factors of the tri-snRNP complex including PRPF3, PRPF8 and PRPF31, previously associated with RP as well. The U4 and U6 variants identified seem to affect snRNP biogenesis, namely the U4/U6 di-snRNP, which is an assembly intermediate of the tri-snRNP. Based on the number of positive cases observed, deleterious variants in RNU4-2 and in RNU6 paralogues could be a significant cause of isolated or dominant RP, accounting for up to 1.2% of all undiagnosed RP cases. This study highlights the role of non-coding genes in rare Mendelian disorders and uncovers pleiotropy in RNU4-2 , where different variants underlie neurodevelopmental disorder and RP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".