An Auto-Adjusting Hybrid Quantum Genetic Algorithm-Spectre platform for the multi-objective optimization of analog circuit sizing
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Among the phases constituting analog circuit design, circuit sizing is considered labor-intensive, formidable, and heavily experience-dependent due to its non-linearity. As a result, design automation coupled with effective optimization techniques has arisen as a feasible candidate to address challenges with circuit design and satisfy the increasing need for high-performance circuits. Among evolutionary algorithms, the combination of the genetic algorithm (GA) and quantum computing techniques has yielded the hybrid quantum genetic algorithm (HQGA) which has proven to be an effective optimization method in many fields due to its convergence rate and near-optimal solutions. This paper introduces an upgraded version of HQGA we call the Auto-adjusting Hybrid Quantum Genetic Algorithm (AHQGA) which avoids premature convergence and improves convergence speed through the use of an additional best-fitness-based scheme for rotation angles. In particular, this work proposes the utility of AHQGA for the multi-objective optimization of analog circuit sizing, with the two-stage Miller-compensated operational amplifier (op-amp) used as a topological case study. Additionally, for an objective evaluation, optimization results by AHQGA are compared with those by HQGA with fixed rotation angles and classical GA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it