Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Intravenous Magnesium Sulfate in Pediatric Acute Asthma Exacerbations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Pediatric asthma exacerbations represent a significant cause of emergency department use and hospitalizations. Despite available treatment options, many children's exacerbations are refractory to standard therapies and require adjunct treatments. The Intravenous Magnesium: Prompt use for Asthma in Children Treated in the Emergency Department study investigated the pharmacology of intravenous magnesium sulfate (IVMg) in treating pediatric asthma exacerbations. Specifically, the objectives of the study included (1) externally validating a previously published population pharmacokinetic model and (2) linking serum magnesium concentrations with outcomes including asthma severity score (efficacy) and hypotension (safety). Data were obtained from 49 children prospectively treated with IVMg (placebo, 50 or 75 mg/kg) after presenting to the pediatric emergency department with an acute asthma exacerbation. Reductions in Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure scores were associated with both total and ionized serum magnesium area under the concentration–time curve (AUC 0–2 h ). Despite frequent study‐specific blood pressure monitoring, hypotension was uncommon in IVMg‐treated participants (n = 2/31), and no concentration dependence was observed. The findings signal that IVMg may be an efficacious and safe option for treating moderate–severe pediatric acute asthma exacerbations in the ED. Importantly, this study is the first to suggest a serum exposure target (total serum magnesium AUC 0‐2 h >63.1 mg h/L) reflective of effective IVMg dosing in pediatric acute asthma. While further study in a larger clinical trial is needed to refine and validate this exposure target, these findings support the continued study of IVMg therapy as an adjunct therapeutic option in the setting of pediatric asthma exacerbations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".