MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406151531 · doi:10.20473/jgar.v5i2.64136

Governance And Mass Migration Of Nigerians Abroad: The Causes And Consequences

2024· article· en· W4406151531 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Adeleke Adegbami, Biola Muhibat Osungboye

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Governance and Administrative Reform · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration and Labor Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)CompromiseNigeriansGovernment (linguistics)Economic growthPolitical scienceBusinessDevelopment economicsEconomicsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The optimism that civilian administration in Nigeria's Fourth Republic would catalyze unparalleled development has gradually waned as Nigerians continue to grapple with precarious economic conditions. A significant proportion of the country’s annual revenue is allocated to servicing domestic and external debts, further diminishing prospects for an improved quality of life. Within this context, this study explores the driving factors behind the mass migration of Nigerians, the preferred destinations of these migrants, and the broader implications of this migration on Nigeria and its citizens. Utilizing both primary and secondary data sources—including direct observations, textbooks, academic journals, official records, and resources from Nigerian government and international organization websites—the study identifies several interrelated drivers of migration. These include widespread poverty, high unemployment rates, poor economic conditions, an underfunded public healthcare system, escalating insecurity, and persistent political challenges. Popular destinations for Nigerian migrants include the United States, the United Kingdom, Italy, Germany, France, and Canada. The findings reveal both positive and negative impacts of mass migration. On one hand, remittances from migrants provide a critical source of income and contribute to economic development. On the other hand, significant challenges arise in key sectors, particularly healthcare and education. For instance, migration-induced shortages of healthcare professionals compromise service delivery, while the outflow of university lecturers creates gaps in research and teaching capacities. Additionally, funds spent by students on tuition fees abroad could otherwise be invested in strengthening Nigeria’s domestic education system. The study concludes that curbing mass migration requires substantive improvements in governance, including the creation of employment opportunities, poverty alleviation, enhanced security, access to quality education and healthcare, improved labor conditions, and an overall elevation in living standards. Keywords: Governance, Mass migration, Poverty, Unemployment, Insecurity, Violent conflict Abstrak Optimisme pemerintahan sipil di Republik Keempat Nigeria akan mendorong perkembangan yang tak tertandingi secara perlahan memudar karena rakyat Nigeria terus menghadapi kondisi ekonomi yang genting. Sebagian besar pendapatan tahunan negara dialokasikan untuk membayar utang dalam negeri dan luar negeri, sehingga semakin memperkecil peluang masyarakat untuk menikmati peningkatan kualitas hidup. Dalam konteks ini, studi ini mengeksplorasi faktor-faktor yang mendorong migrasi massal warga Nigeria, destinasi utama para migran, serta dampak lebih luas dari migrasi ini terhadap Nigeria dan warganya. Dengan menggunakan sumber data primer dan sekunder termasuk observasi langsung, buku teks, jurnal akademik, catatan resmi, serta sumber daya dari situs web pemerintah Nigeria dan organisasi internasional, studi ini mengidentifikasi sejumlah faktor saling terkait yang mendorong migrasi. Faktor-faktor tersebut mencakup kemiskinan yang meluas, tingginya tingkat pengangguran, kondisi ekonomi yang buruk, sistem kesehatan publik yang kurang terdanai, meningkatnya ketidakamanan, serta tantangan politik yang terus berlanjut. Destinasi utama bagi para migran Nigeria meliputi Amerika Serikat, Inggris, Italia, Jerman, Prancis, dan Kanada. Temuan studi ini mengungkapkan dampak positif dan negatif dari migrasi massal. Di satu sisi, remitansi dari para migran menjadi sumber pendapatan penting dan berkontribusi pada pembangunan ekonomi. Di sisi lain, tantangan signifikan muncul di sektor-sektor utama, khususnya kesehatan dan pendidikan. Misalnya, kekurangan tenaga kesehatan akibat migrasi mengurangi kualitas layanan kesehatan, sementara migrasi dosen universitas menciptakan kekosongan dalam kapasitas penelitian dan pengajaran. Selain itu, dana yang dihabiskan mahasiswa untuk biaya pendidikan di luar negeri seharusnya dapat diinvestasikan untuk memperkuat sistem pendidikan domestik Nigeria. Studi ini menyimpulkan bahwa mengurangi migrasi massal membutuhkan perbaikan signifikan dalam tata kelola, termasuk penciptaan lapangan kerja, pengentasan kemiskinan, peningkatan keamanan, akses terhadap pendidikan dan layanan kesehatan berkualitas, perbaikan kondisi tenaga kerja, serta peningkatan standar hidup secara keseluruhan. Kata kunci: Tata kelola, Migrasi massal, Kemiskinan, Pengangguran, Ketidakamanan, Konflik kekerasan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Governance and Administrative ReformSame topicMigration and Labor DynamicsFrench-language works237,207