Comparison of Post-Operative Infectious Morbidity in Patients Undergoing Elective Caesarean Section with Administration of Antibiotic Before Skin Incision and After Cord Clamping
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: To compare post-operative infectious morbidity in patients undergoing elective cesarean section with administration of antibiotic before skin incision and after cord clamping Methods: In this prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial all the women of age 18-40 years, being scheduled for cesarean section on elective list due to any reason, were included. They were divided into two groups: Group A included pre-incision group and Group B included cord-clamp group. Patients in group A were given 1G Ceftriaxone intravenously (IV), about 15-30 minutes before skin incision while in group B patients; antibiotic was administered after cord clamping. Post-operatively, patients were assessed for wound infection, endometritis, pyelonephritis, UTI and overall infectious morbidity. Results: A total of 174 patients were enrolled in the study. The mean age of the patients was 27.17 ± 4.68 years. The demographic characteristics were generally evenly distributed in both groups. Maternal outcomes in both groups including wound infection,urinary tract infections, endometriosis, pyelonephritis and overall infectious morbidity did not reach a statistically significant level. Conclusion: Administration of prophylactic antibiotic at 30–60 min before skin incision resulted in better maternal outcome than after cord clamp. However it is not significant and we recommend more clinical trials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".