Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to conduct an empirical and practical study of the characteristics of progressive Islam and inculturation in Muhammadiyah educational institutions. In turn, it will be an inspiration and model of progressive education in the world of education. The research method is to use literature sources (library research). This means that the data and study materials used are from library sources. As for the results of the study that the characteristics of progressive Islam (al-Islam al-Taqaddumi), which includes a progressive view of Islam in five characteristics (al-Khasha'ishu alhamsu). These characteristics are: (1) Based on Tawhid (al-Mabni 'ala al-Tauhid); (2) Emphasising human thought from shirk, syncretism and religious nationalism; (3) Upholding reason and science; (4) Promoting social justice; (5) Emphasising the importance of noble character. The inculturation of progressive education is done by First, building schools that integrate religious and general education and strengthen school branding. Second, developing education based on social life and the needs of society and the world of work. Third, reforming the system and values by adopting modern values of the 21st century.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".