MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406161826 · doi:10.1007/s10592-024-01670-2

Conservation aquaculture of wild-origin offspring preserves genetic diversity in an endangered population of white sturgeon

2025· article· en· W4406161826 on OpenAlexafffund
Peter N. Johnson, James A. Crossman, Andy O. Miller, Jason G. McLellan, Matthew D. Howell, Andrea Schreier

Bibliographic record

VenueConservation Genetics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsBC Hydro (Canada)
FundersUniversity of California, DavisBC HydroGenome Center, University of California, DavisNational Institutes of HealthFreshwater Fisheries Society of British Columbia
KeywordsEndangered speciesBiologyBiodiversitySturgeonGenetic diversityWhite (mutation)AquacultureOffspringPopulationFisheryEcologyConservation geneticsZoologyHabitatDemographyFish <Actinopterygii>GeneticsPregnancyMicrosatelliteAllele

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Conservation aquaculture programs that release fish to supplement wild populations can potentially capture greater genetic diversity by collecting offspring as embryos and larvae from wild spawning events than by producing them conventionally from broodstock. A conservation aquaculture program for the endangered white sturgeon population of the Upper Columbia River initially utilized wild broodstock for 14 years before fully transitioning to rearing wild-origin offspring in 2014. Here we evaluated the performance of this program in capturing the wild population’s genetic diversity since transitioning to wild-origin offspring. We analyzed genotypes of 325 tetrasomic single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers in more than 5,000 offspring reared from 2014 to 2020 and over 1,000 wild adults from the population. Genetic diversity statistics were highly similar between each offspring year class and the wild adult population. We inferred sibship structure to estimate the total number of spawners (N s ) and effective number of breeders (N b ) represented within each year class and found values as high as 932.5 (95% CI 876–989) and 146.3 (95% CI 144–149), respectively, far surpassing the numbers included as broodstock. We further estimated N s and N b for three year classes with their individuals that died in aquaculture and found that on average, the mortality rate of 33.2% decreased N s by 21.5% and N b by 7.9%. Finally, we analyzed relationship coefficients to identify full-sibships spanning collection sites and found them in one year class, comprising 0.27% of all full-sibling pairs that year, demonstrating that the separate sites display negligible redundancy with respect to sibling families collected. Our results illustrate a robust performance by this program in representing the wild population’s diversity compared to broodstock approaches and support the adoption of utilizing wild-origin offspring in other conservation aquaculture programs when feasible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConservation GeneticsSame topicFish Ecology and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207