MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406164575 · doi:10.4000/131lp

Archives du développement : produire, mobiliser et politiser

2024· paratext· fr· W4406164575 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue internationale des études du développement · 2024
Typeparatext
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhysicsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On assiste depuis les années 2000 à un renouveau des approches historiques du développement. De l’histoire à la science politique, ces travaux font du développement un point d’entrée pour saisir les circulations d’experts et de savoirs, la construction des États au Sud, et plus largement la place des rapports Nord-Sud dans le gouvernement du monde. Si ce renouveau repose sur une diversification des archives mobilisées, il ne s’est pas pour autant accompagné d’un débat sur les usages possibles, mais aussi les limites de ces archives, ni d’enquêtes sur la façon dont les acteurs du développement les produisent. Ce numéro se veut un plaidoyer pour une réflexion propre aux « archives du développement » en tant que porteuses d’enjeux particuliers, entre Nord et Sud, qu’il s’agisse de l’éclatement géographique des matériaux, ou de la capacité de certains acteurs à (faire) écrire et faire valoir leur récit au détriment des autres. L’objectif poursuivi dans ce dossier est donc double : offrir des points de repère méthodologiques à qui souhaite mobiliser et donc contextualiser ces archives, mais aussi poser les bases d’un projet plus ambitieux d’enquête sur les archives du développement. De l’Inde au Mali, de la Turquie au Canada, les articles de ce dossier explorent dans ce but la façon dont ces archives du développement sont produites, mobilisées, et politisées, sur des sujets aussi divers que l’action humanitaire, l’agriculture, l’énergie solaire, la planification urbaine, l’économie, ou encore la santé. Since the 2000s, there has been renewed interest in historical approaches to development. From history to political science, development has become an entry point to understand the circulation of experts and knowledge, the construction of states in the South, and more broadly the place of North-South relations in world governance. While this renewed interest has relied on diversifying the archives used, it has not been accompanied by a debate on the possible uses of these archives, but also their limits, or by surveys on the way in which development actors have been producing them. This issue calls for an insightful approach that is specific to “development archives,” due to the stakes associated with them, caught as they are between the North and the South, whether the geographical fragmentation of materials, or the ability of certain actors to tell their stories (or have them told) and put them forward to the detriment of others. The aim of this issue is therefore twofold: to offer methodological points of reference to those who wish to use and therefore contextualize such archives, but also to lay the foundations for a more ambitious project that is a survey of development archives. From India to Mali, from Turkey to Canada, the articles in this issue thus explore the way in which development archives have been produced, used, and politicized, on subjects as varied as humanitarian aid, agriculture, solar energy, urban planning, the economy, or even health. Desde los años 2000, asistimos a una renovación de los planteamientos históricos del desarrollo. Ya sea en la historia o en la ciencia política, estos trabajos hacen del desarrollo un punto de entrada para comprender las circulaciones de expertos y de conocimientos, la construcción de los Estados en el sur y, de manera más vasta, el lugar que ocupan las relaciones norte-sur en el gobierno mundial. Si esta renovación se basa en una diversificación de los archivos movilizados, sin embargo, no ha sido acompañada de un debate acerca de las posibles utilizaciones, de los límites de estos archivos ni de las investigaciones sobre la forma en la que son producidos por los actores del desarrollo. Este número pretende ser un alegato para una reflexión propia de los “archivos del desarrollo” como portadores de desafíos particulares entre el norte y el sur, ya se trate de la fragmentación geográfica de los materiales como de la capacidad de ciertos actores a hacer (escribir) y reivindicar su relato en detrimento de los otros actores. El objetivo perseguido en este dossier es doble: ofrecer puntos de referencia metodológicos a quien desee movilizar y, por lo tanto, contextualizar estos archivos, pero también fijar las bases de un proyecto más ambicioso de investigación de los archivos del desarrollo. De la India a Mali, de Turquía a Canadá, los artículos de este dossier exploran con tal finalidad la manera en la que estos archivos del desarrollo se producen, movilizan y politizan con respecto a temas tan variados como la acción humanitaria, la agricultura, la energía solar, la planificación urbana, la economía o la salud.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.853
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.185
GPT teacher head0.431
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue internationale des études du développementSame topicEducation, sociology, and vocational trainingFrench-language works237,207