MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4406177467 · doi:10.1111/milt.12502

The Communion of the Book: Milton and the Humanist Revolution in ReadingDavidWilliams. Montreal: <scp>McGill</scp>‐Queens <scp>UP</scp>, 2022. xxiv+502pp.<scp>ISBN</scp> 13: 9780228014690. $104.00 (cloth).

2024· article· en· W4406177467 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Erin Webster

Bibliographic record

VenueMilton Quarterly · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtTheologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

David Williams'sThe Communion of the Book is an unusual monograph in the best sense.In essence a history of the rise of Western modernity as told through the actions of readers, the book is part intellectual history, part media studies, and part literary analysis, both a gentle lament for the impending eclipse of "a culture historically shaped by print" (xxii) and an elegant example of the critical reading practices that Williams sees as having been central to that culture.In this second role the book makes its most interesting contributions to the field of early modern studies as it traces a wide and often circuitous route from the methodological principles and practices of the early Italian humanists through to their intellectual fulfilment in John Milton's late seventeenth-century writings, The History of Britain (1670) and Paradise Regain'd to which is added Samson Agonistes (1671), the latter a book in which, for Williams, "the key lessons of the humanist revolution in reading are starkly dramatized " (23).In between, we are treated to an interconnected set of case studies focused on the various kinds of reading that in Williams's view gave rise to the modern mind: philological, sacramental, juridical, historiographical, and classical.Indeed, Williams's claim that these particular modes of reading helped shape modern consciousness is more than mere metaphor.The Communion of the Book is framed in part as a response to evolutionary biologist Joseph Henrich's theory-itself rooted in recent studies in the field of neuroscience-that the increase of literacy in the regions surrounding Martin Luther's hometown of Wittenburg in the sixteenth century produced psychological changes in the human brain that led to the development of our current WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democratic) society.[Correction added on 18 February 2025: The word 'Communication' has been updated to 'Communion' in the preceding sentence.].Williams accepts Henrich's premise but adds to it the caveat, worked out over the course of his subsequent study, that it was not just any form of literacy that ushered in what we have come to describe as the modern era but, rather, a particular kind of reading practiced and developed by humanist scholars and their early modern successors.As he puts it in his Introduction, the first generation of Italian humanists "managed to change history" by "hunting down copies of lost texts from antiquity, by translating older, more authoritative copies of existing works, by emending corrupted texts and annotating variants, and by using philological methods to resituate these texts in the historical context where they were produced" (11-12).Moreover-and perhaps more importantly-these reading practices coupled with the invention of print and the introduction of paper books, "progressively transformed Western psychology," "revolutionizing religion

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.008
Scholarly communication0.0090.007
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMilton Quarterly→Same topicHistorical and Literary Studies→French-language works237,207→